I was reading about the Republic . it the following introduction to a survey of drivers of heavy vehicles:
many miles, no rest. And those who rebel is out because there are many foreigners are ready to take over for little money. The decline in the wild is one of the characteristics of the sector. 37% of motorway accidents involving trucks.
I thought that this simple incipit, fulminant, as a warning to those who consider sociology, the science of society, something superfluous, useless, a waste of time. If instead of thinking to act on facts that were known a priori source social facts themselves with serious and thorough sociological survey, there would always late to play around with the problems remedied with the laws and hairpieces.
Sociology Labour, for example, is not very different from that in its view that the investigation of Republic wants to learn and to teach readers of the newspaper. Are the methods that could also enrich the knowledge of citizens of the State before the reality analyzed by the newspaper to pressure from employers on the workers resulting in a safety issue for everyone.
I'm not a sociologist of work, although I came across educational background in the study of sociology and also in the sociology of work. I must say that I opened my mind to many things, not as an alternative, but in addition to the wealth of knowledge about the reality of working life could be mastered, just enough to channel investigations such as those of the newspaper La Repubblica on the rails of a structured and rigorous scientific discourse.
So, dear dr. Bruno Vespa, in front of your considerations on sociology as useless, just when a sociologist ( Renato Mannheimer ) is responsible for the care and comments on the surveys of your show 'Porta a Porta', I can say that, not only in the U.S. , where sociology is valued and prized, there will always be scholars and enthusiasts who defend the presence of social sciences in all fields of study and deepening where these sciences have much to give and to say about the progress of the nation and of humanity .
Sociology Labour, for example, is not very different from that in its view that the investigation of Republic wants to learn and to teach readers of the newspaper. Are the methods that could also enrich the knowledge of citizens of the State before the reality analyzed by the newspaper to pressure from employers on the workers resulting in a safety issue for everyone.
I'm not a sociologist of work, although I came across educational background in the study of sociology and also in the sociology of work. I must say that I opened my mind to many things, not as an alternative, but in addition to the wealth of knowledge about the reality of working life could be mastered, just enough to channel investigations such as those of the newspaper La Repubblica on the rails of a structured and rigorous scientific discourse.
So, dear dr. Bruno Vespa, in front of your considerations on sociology as useless, just when a sociologist ( Renato Mannheimer ) is responsible for the care and comments on the surveys of your show 'Porta a Porta', I can say that, not only in the U.S. , where sociology is valued and prized, there will always be scholars and enthusiasts who defend the presence of social sciences in all fields of study and deepening where these sciences have much to give and to say about the progress of the nation and of humanity .
0 comments:
Post a Comment